As a result of the questionable job that the Selection Committee did with this year's bracket, not many bracketologists had an overly successful Selection Sunday. After the committee selected the teams, I looked back at the bracket predictions by yours truly and many other "bracketologists". Here is the breakdown; choose for yourself as to who was the most accurate:
March Madness All Season (Me): 62/65 teams correct, 31 seeded exactly, 50 teams within one seed line
Joe Lunardi (ESPN): 63/65 teams correct, 29 seeded exactly, 49 teams within one seed line
Stewart Mandel (CNN/SI): 62/65 teams correct, 23 seeded exactly, 48 teams within one seed line
Gregg Doyel (CBS Sportsline): 63/65 teams correct, 28 seeded exactly, 48 teams within one seed line
Michael Lazarus (FoxSports): 62/65 teams correct, 28 seeded exactly, 51 teams within one seed line
Jerry Palm (CollegeRPI.com): 61/65 teams correct, 26 seeded exactly, 42 teams within one seed line
Michael Moran (USA Today): 61/65 teams correct, 25 seeded exactly, 43 teams within one seed line
Bracketology 101: 62/65 teams correct, 29 seeded exactly, 50 teams within one seed line
Bracketography.com: 62/65 teams correct, 31 seeded exactly, 47 teams within one seed line
The Bracket Board: 62/65 teams correct, 25 seeded exactly, 49 teams within one seed line
BubbleTeams.com: 62/65 teams correct, 28 seeded exactly, 51 teams within one seed line
Bracket Express: 62/65 teams correct, 23 seeded exactly, 45 teams within one seed line
For more information on these and other bracket projections, and links to the projected brackets, check out "Bracket Comparisons" over at BubbleTeams.com.
Lunardi got his 63rd team by putting in Seton Hall about an hour before the selection show.
ReplyDeleteinside information? he's a bum.
you're better
I think he put George Mason in right before the show, but the principle is the same.
ReplyDeleteHe had GMU as the fifth team out heading into Selection Sunday, and then he had a change of heart and decided to jump them up seven spots?
If he had inside information, it's unfair. But, hey, I did better than him in the actual seeding, so that's good enough.
Joe Lunardi is one of the best bracket anaylists there is. He got 63/65 teams right and i think you should look toward him and Greg Doyel for anaylism and predictions.
ReplyDeleteWho do you fellas got in the final four and in the champion seat?
ReplyDeleteAll the top bracketologists did a fine job. You’ve got to give Mr. Lunardi credit if he slid in a team before time expired… You don’t get inside information unless you’re in or close to earshot of the door. Though the selection committee made some mistakes, I highly doubt there was a late-inclusion leak.… Congratulations though on your 31-29 win in picking exact seeds.
ReplyDeleteGalapagos Islands, Tours, Hotels, and more...
ReplyDeleteEcuador Travel Site - A guide to have the greatest vacations in one of the most beautiful countries in the world, find all the main info about Ecuador: history, tours, hotels, Galapagos islands cruises, car rental. You can find more info at http://www.ecuadortravelsite.com.
Costa Rica Index -TOUR OPERATOR-
Informative Country Guide and Costa Rica Tourism Board, Tourism, entertaintment, ecologic, small business, costa rica travel, costa rica vacation, costa rica tours, rainforest, Costa Rica hotels.
Glasspipe and glass pipe Amazing Legal Herbal Highs, featuring Herbal Smoke, Herbal highs, Marijuana Alternative, Headshop Herbal Smoking Blends, Hashish, Herbal Smoke Online, Headshop, Smokeshop, cannibis, legal smoking alternatives for herbal highs and aphrodisia. www.headshopinternational.com
ReplyDeleteStarting tomorrow, I will have a complete Sweet Sixteen preview, broken down region-by-region. It will include players to watch, favorites and sleepers, and much more.
ReplyDeletecasino on line
www.enterbet.com
online casino
top casino
videopoker
top online casino
online poker
sportsbook
online casino
poker
internet casino
Also, how is everyone's bracket doing? If you use the typical one point for each first round win and two points for each second-round victory, I would have 44 points. Not bad, but not good by any means. How is everyone else's doing?